top of page

Due to the effects of climate change, the occurrence of naturally disastrous events such as hurricanes, typhoons and tropical storms are on the rise. Coastal urban areas will be directly and negatively impacted in terms of land loss, infrastructure damages and displacement. It is therefore imperative that we create resilient and sustainable solutions to protect the coastal regions of the world from the impacts of climate change. A natural solution to storm surge protection is the presence of coral reefs, which offer natural defence against coastal erosion and flooding through wave attenuation and the retention of sand, effectively dissipating 97% of wave energy (Ferrario et al, 2014). However, due to human interference and coral bleaching, their resilience has severely degraded. 3D printing is a recent innovation that has the potential to provide high levels of reliability and resilience to coastal adaptation and mitigation efforts. This technology does not require high upfront investments, development time or specialized skills and knowledge, making it a universal solution to climate change (van Wijk, 2015). Furthermore, it provides advantages such as design freedom, faster and local production, and high levels of cost-effectiveness (van Wijk, 2015; X. Gu et al., 2015). This solution has the potential to positively impact 50% of the global population that currently suffers the effects of storm surges (Ferrerio, 2014). Furthermore, the United States is within the top 10 countries that would benefit from the implementation of 3D printed coral reefs (Ferrerio, 2014).

Home: Homepage_about
Cloudy Ocean

IMPACTS OF STORM SURGES

Turtle in the Reef

BENEFITS OF NATURAL REEFS

Yellow 3D Printed Shape

3D PRINTED REEFS

Earth

GLOBAL APPLICATION

Home: News

OUR RESEARCH

Cloudy Ocean

STORM SURGE IMPACTS

Ecosystems and inhabitants of coastal zones, low-lying areas, and small island nations are exposed to a variety of natural hazards such as coastal erosion, coastal flooding, submergence, saltwater intrusion and tsunamis as a result of storm surges and extreme weather events. Due to climate change induced effects, the likelihood of these naturally hazardous events will increase, making coastal areas more vulnerable to land loss, infrastructure damages and displacement.  According to the United Nations, approximately 40% of the world's population lives within 100 kilometres of a coast and 10% live in coastal areas that are less than 10 metres above sea level (United Nations, 2017).

​

Sea level rise is regarded as the most significant risk to both human and natural systems in coastal low-lying areas due to climate change (Nurse et al., 2014; Wong et al., 2014). Increasing greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere produce changes in the climate system on a range of time scales that impact the coastal physical environment through sea level rise. Sea level rise and the resulting extreme sea levels in coastal areas are mainly driven by ocean thermal expansion and the loss of ice mass from glaciers and ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica (Vousdoukas et al., 2018). On shorter time scales, physical coastal impacts such as inundation, erosion, and coastal flooding arise from severe storm surges, wave overtopping and rainfall runoff (Wong et al., 2014). A storm surge is an episodic increase in sea level driven by shoreward wind-driven water circulation and atmospheric pressure (Vousdoukas et al., 2018).  On longer time scales, climate change impacts on wind and waves can cause changes in sediment transport at the coast and associated changes in erosion or accretion (Wong et al., 2018).

​

Throughout the past century the global mean sea level has risen at approximate rates of 1.3mm to 1.7mm per year (Nurse et al., 2014). Since 1993, it has accelerated to rates between 2.8 and 3.6mm per year (Nurse et al., 2014). Future climate projections suggest sea level rise on the order of 0.5 to 2.0m by 2100 (Vousdoukas et al., 2018; Wong et al., 2014; Storlazzi et al., 2011). Climatic and sea level projections are essential for future risk assessment, coastal planning and the design of coastal protection.

Waves

CURRENT AND PROJECTED IMPACTS

Extreme Weather Events

  • Increasing seawater temperatures provide more energy for storms that develop at sea, leading to fewer but more intense tropical cyclones globally (United Nations, 2017).

  • 90% of natural disasters are classed as climate related, cost the world economy US$520 billion per year, and push 26 million people into poverty each year (United Nations, 2017).

  • Since 2008, an annual average of 21.5 million people have been forcibly internally displaced by sudden weather-related hazards (United Nations, 2017).


Impacts on Human Settlements

  • For 136 port cities over 1 million inhabitants, the number of people exposed to extreme sea level is expected to increase from 39 million in 2005 to 59 million by 2070 given an increase in global mean sea level rise of 0.5 metres. This number increases to 148 million if socio-economic development is considered (Wong et al., 2014).

  • 72 to 187 million people are expected to be displaced due to land loss and erosion by 2100 assuming global mean sea level rise of 0.5 to 2.0 m. Upgrading coastal defences would reduce these impacts roughly by three orders of magnitude (Wong et al., 2014)

  • Sea level rise of half a metre could displace 1.2 million people from low-lying islands in the Caribbean Sea and the Indian and Pacific Oceans (United Nations, 2017).


Impacts on Infrastructure, Industry, and Transport

  • Hurricanes like Katrina (2005) caused US$100 million of damage to Mississippi’s ports and Sandy (2012) led to a week-long shut-down of the Port of New York, generating economic damages reaching US$50 billion (Wong et al., 2014)

  • The potential costs associated with damage to harbours and ports due to sea level rise could be as high as $US111.6 billion by 2050 and $US367.2 billion by the end of the century (United Nations, 2017).

  • By 2070, asset exposure is estimated to increase to approximately 9% of projected global GDP given a sea level rise of 0.5m, a 10% increase in extreme water levels, and a fixed subsidence rate in susceptible cities (Wong et al., 2014).

  • Rebuilding costs of tourist resorts in Caribbean countries are estimated to reach US$10 to 23.3 billion in 2050 (Wong et al., 2014).

  • Sea level rise of 1 metre would result in the loss or damage of 21 airports, inundation of land surrounding 35 ports, and damages and losses of at least 149 multi-million dollar tourism resorts (Wong et al., 2014).


Impacts on Ecosystems

  • The effects of sea level rise will impact coastal ecosystems through coastal erosion, wetland and coastal plain flooding, salinization of aquifers and soils, and a loss of habitats for fish, birds, and other wildlife and plants (Plag & Jules-Plag, 2013).

  • The IPCC estimates that a continuation of the current global sea level rise would likely lead to a loss of as much as 33% of coastal land and wetland habitats in the next hundred years (Plag & Jules-Plag, 2013).

Sand & Sky

COASTAL PROTECTION AND ADAPTATION

Without adaptation, hundreds of millions of people will be affected by coastal flooding and will be displaced due to land loss by year 2100. The majority of those affected are from East, Southeast, and South Asia. The most economically vulnerable countries are low-lying developing countries like Bangladesh, Vietnam and Small Island Development States. They are expected to face associated annual damage and adaptation costs of up to 10% of their GDP. However, the benefits of protecting against increased coasting flooding and land loss at the global scale are larger than the social and economic costs of inaction (Wong et al., 2014).


Although the potential global impacts of coastal flood damage and land loss on human settlements in the 21st century are substantial, these impacts can be reduced considerably through coastal protection. Natural storm surge barriers exist, such as sand dunes, mangroves and coral reefs, but with massive global coral bleaching and loss of exposed fringing reef flats (Storlazzi et al., 2011), new approaches and engineered solutions are required.

Sea Turtle

NATURAL REEFS

Coral reefs are submerged geologic marine formations. Although typically located in shallow, tropical waters, there are also deep-sea corals that are located around the globe. By definition, a reef refers to any submerged marine navigation barrier that is 18m in depth or less (David and Brannet, 2010). Shallow reef-building corals live in strict environmental conditions of warm, relatively clear and saline waters. Their ecosystems are broken into 3 sections; the fore-reef, reef crest, and reef flat, also known as a lagoon. The fore-reef is the seaward side of the reef, which drops deeper than the suitable habitat for corals. Corals build reef structures known as reef crests that are built up by ramparts. Latypov (2016) describes these coral ramparts as massive rounded coral heads and robust branching corals, which build a rigid cavernous palisade of intergrown coral skeletons. These major features reach up towards the surface of the water, growing vertically and, depending on sea water levels, horizontally. They have the ability to span tens to thousands of metres wide parallel to coastlines, therefore providing structural habitats for vertebrate and invertebrate species. Crests may touch the shoreline but usually enclose reef flats and sandy lagoons (Latypov, 2016). The shallow reef flats, protected by the crests, are home to corals forming massive buttresses separated by narrow sandy channels, which pass a steady flow of sediment made from dead coral, calcareous algae and other organisms (Latypov, 2016). The crest and canyon pattern create a rugged terrain, which helps sediment flow and dissipation of wave energy through friction.

Waves

REEFS AS BREAKWATERS

Coral reefs are a natural form of defence from erosion and flooding of coastal communities. Through wave attenuation and the production and retention of sand, natural reef crests function similar to breakwaters by dissipating wave energy and protecting the shoreline (Borja et al., 2018). The friction caused by the rigid terrain of the reef flat and the initial break over the reef crest significantly reduces the energy of offshore waves (Elliff and Silva, 2017).  Reefs can significantly reduce wave energy across 3 reef environments, the reef crest, the reef flat and the reef as a whole. Studies by Ferrario et alia (2014) have shown that reef crests dissipate on average 86% of incident wave energy, with the reef flats dissipating 65% of the remaining wave energy, making the whole reef have a total energy reduction of 97%. It should be noted that the whole reef dissipating 97% of wave energy is consistent from small daily wave events to sea swells and hurricane level waves. Along with wave energy, wave height is significantly reduced along all 3 reef environments. Wave height is reduced 64% of the incident height by the reef crest, 43% of the remaining height by the reef flat and 84% by the whole reef. Reduction of wave energy and height occurs mostly within 150m of the reef crest (Ferrario et al, 2014).

​

Natural habitats are currently helping to protect coastlines, yet climate change and human interference are destroying coral reef ecosystems. The restoration and protection of coral reefs is necessary, however current efforts may be lacking in comparison to the current rates of climate change. As a mitigation effort, artificial reefs are being constructed as submerged breakwaters in an effort to reduce offshore sediment transport by rip currents, sediment loss to the continental shelf, and promote slow beach recovery, creating a buffer zone for coastal infrastructure. Borja et alia (2018) use a 3 phase approach to study the role of reefs in shoreline protection. First is an analysis of historical changes in the shoreline, sea levels, wave climate, etc. Secondly is an assessment of the role of coral reefs in shoreline positioning. Lastly, a reef-based solution is designed specific for the local coastlines, whether restoration-based or artificial design.

Yellow 3D Printed Shape

3D PRINTED CORAL REEFS

Natural materials such as nacre, barnacle and abalone, often outperform synthetic materials in terms of their multi-functionality and ability to resist impacts and tolerating defects (van Wijk, 2015; X. Gu et al., 2015).  Many of these natural structures are a result of complex architecture built from simple building blocks, which makes them extremely adaptable to situations requiring mechanical resilience and environmental compatibility (X. Gu et al., 2015). However, harvesting these materials for large-scale application is both environmentally degrading and costly. It is therefore essential to use alternative methods to create materials that have similar material functions, without the environmental or economic impacts.

An emerging innovation that is currently being implemented in many biomimicry-based solutions is the use of 3D printing. New progress in this field has allowed researchers to print multiple materials at upper micrometre resolution, which allows for an accurate imitation of the geometry and composition of naturally occurring materials (X. Gu et al., 2015). In combination with computational modelling and biological and chemical synthesis, 3D printing has allowed researchers to achieve high mechanical resilience and reliability in functioning models. The results are stronger structures that can withstand natural disasters and extreme environmental conditions, and that are optimized for a specific function, location or scale (van Wijk, 2015; X. Gu et al., 2015).


3D printing has the ability to change the way we respond to natural disasters in terms of adaptation and mitigation. High-risk countries and regions currently having to outsource materials will be able to ship a Stereo Lithography (STL) file instead of an actual part to help implement resilient infrastructure (X. Gu et al., 2015). This means that they will be able to produce, manufacture and control products independently, allowing them to personalize adaptive innovations and apply them where it’s needed most. It does not require high upfront investments, development time or specialized skills and knowledge, making it a universal solution to climate change (van Wijk, 2015). The advantages to 3D printing are extensive, including design freedom, faster product development cycles, low start-up costs for production, local production and on-demand manufacturing (van Wijk, 2015; X. Gu et al., 2015). Furthermore, it holds the potential to use biomaterials from renewable resources rather than traditional fossil fuel based products like plastic, creating a manufacturing industry with less waste and energy, providing resilience and sustainability.


3D printing of coral reefs is an emerging innovation with little research available. However, the largest application to date was conducted in August 2018 in the Maldives, developed using Modular Artificial Reef Structure (MARS) technology by Reef Design Lab. This process starts with the 3D printing of modular, Lego-like corals that are cast in ceramic- a material that offers many similarities to naturally occurring coral (Reef Design Lab, 2018). By coating the 3D modules in a material similar to naturally occurring ones, it offers the possibility to transplant corals and molluscs, which provide additional wave attenuation properties (X. Gu et al., 2015). The modular design allows individual reef units to be arranged with variable height, width and alignment, which improves adaptability to the seabed and provides increased hydrodynamic performance (Borja et al., 2018). Furthermore, the 3D printing of coral reefs in small units further decreases the cost of installation associated with other artificial storm-breaks, such as the use of cranes and barges (Borja et al., 2018; Goad, 2018). All that is required to install the modules are certified scuba divers who can manually attach each piece underwater (Goad, 2018).

Earth

GLOBAL APPLICATION OF 3D-PRINTED REEFS

To have the same effect as natural coral reefs against wave energy, 3D printed reef crests should be located a minimum of 150m from the coastline. They should also be at depths similar to those of natural crests, a maximum of 18m, which is the maximum depth for coral growth, although artificial corals may still be effective at lower depths. The form and material of specific 3D models may also be depth dependent. There is an estimated 197 million people that live both below an elevation of 10m and within 50km of a natural reef, who may receive benefits from reefs for coastal protection. The countries with the greatest number of at-risk people who may receive risk reduction benefits from reefs are Indonesia, India and the Philippines whether we consider distances of 10 or 50 km from reefs. These three countries alone include 50% of the people globally that live in low exposed areas near reefs. The USA ranks within the top 10 of countries in number of people that may receive risk reduction benefits from reefs (Ferrerio, 2014).

Home: Project
EMlogo clear.png

WHO WE ARE

We come from all walks of life and believe our diversity makes us resilient and agile. We believe in fostering change through systems thinking and believe in the power of leadership and education.

DSC_0011.jpg

H. BSc Environmental Sciences - Conservation and Biodiversity
University of Ottawa

​

Advanced Diploma in Ecosystem Management Technology
Fleming College

DSC_0003.jpg

H. BA Environmental Studies and Geography

University of Ottawa

​

Advanced Diploma in Ecosystem Management Technology Fleming College

DSC_0004.jpg

H. BA Environmental Studies and Human Geography
University of Toronto

Advanced Diploma in Ecosystem Management Technology Fleming College

DSC_0007.jpg

H. BSc Environmental Science - Earth Science

Lakehead University

​

Advanced Diploma in Ecosystem Management Technology Fleming College

Home: News

REFERENCES

Blanchon, P., Iglesias-Prieto, R., Jorda´n Dahlgren, E. & Richards, S. (2010). Vulnerabilidad de las Zonas Costeras Mexicanas Ante el Cambio Clima´tico. Universidad Auto´noma de Campeche 229–248


Borja, R., Beck, M., Agostini, V., Kramer, P., Hancock, B. (2018). Coral reefs for coastal protection: Anew methodological approach and engineering case study in Grenada. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 146-161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.024


Davin, T. B., & Brannet, A. P. (2010). Coral Reefs : Biology, Threats and Restoration. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.


Elliff, C., Silva, I. (2017). Coral reefs as the first line of defense: Shoreline protection in face of climate change. Marine Environmental Research, 127, 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.03.007


Ferrario, F., Beck, M., Storlazzi, C., Michelo, F., Shepard, C., Airoldi, L. (2014). The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaptation. Nature Communications, 5. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4794

​

Goad, A. (2018). The MARS Project . Retrieved 12 04, 2018, from ALEX GOAD: http://www.alex-goad.com/mars/

Reef Design Labs. (2017). MARS - Modular Artificial Reef Structure . Retrieved 12 04, 2018, from REEF DESIGN LAB: http://www.reefdesignlab.com/mars/


Latypov, I. (2016). Coral Reef Ecosystem in Space and Time : (based on the Reefs of Vietnam). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

​

Nurse, L.A., McLean, R.F., Agard, J., Briguglio, L.P., Duvat-Magnan, V., Pelesikoti, N., Tompkins, E., & Webb, A. (2014). Small islands. In Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R., & White, L.L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1613-1654). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom & New York, NY, USA.


Plag, H.-P., & Jules-Plag, S. (2013). Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Ecosystems. Climate Vulnerability, 163–184. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384703-4.00419-6


Storlazzi, C., Elias, E., Field, M., & Presto, M. (2011). Numerical modeling of the impact of sea-level rise on fringing coral reef hydrodynamics and sediment transport. Coral Reefs, 30(S1), 83-96. doi: 10.1007/s00338-011-0723-9


United Nations (2017). The Oceans Conference: Ocean Fact Sheet. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Ocean-fact-sheet-package.pdf


Vousdoukas, M., Mentaschi, L., Voukouvalas, E., Verlaan, M., Jevrejeva, S., Jackson, L., & Feyen, L. (2018). Global probabilistic projections of extreme sea levels show intensification of coastal flood hazard. Nature Communications, 9(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04692-w


Wijk, A. v. (2015). 3d printing biomaterials towards a sustainable and circular economy. Imprint Delft University Press . IOS Press .


Wong, P.P., Losada, I.J., Gattuso, J.-P., Hinkel, J., Khattabi, A., McInnes, K.L., Saito, Y. & Sallenger, A. (2014). Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R., & White, L.L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts,Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 361-409). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom & New York, NY, USA.

​

X. Gu et al. . (2015). 3D-printing of bio-inspired composites. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering , 138 (2), 16.

Home: CV

©2018 by Ecosystem Management Technology, Fleming College, Lindsay, Ontario, Canada. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page